Regime Change Terrorists: US-EU Coalition

CNN (Feb 4, 2012) reports "U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice says the U.S. is disgusted t see some countries are holding up the resolution condemning Syria" (CNN Video U.S. is 'disgusted' over UN Syria veto). No, it is US administration disgusting; International Community appreciates China and Russia for using veto to prevent mass civilian slaughter by US-EU coalition in the name of democracy. 

Regime Change Strategy

 Select (US) unfriendly nation or a booming nation. Provide arms to a selected rebel group. Wait until civilian killings take place. Give a media coverage on civilian casualties. Pass a UN resolution at UN Security Council  calling protection of civilians. Freeze Financial Assets of that nation (as an advance payment for war) and bring sanctions to bring down its economy ( give more business opportunities to coalition partners and get commissions for bringing businesses to them). Destroy cities from air (to avoid own casualties) in order to 'protect civilians' (in reality, killing even more civilians). Transfer Money if cost of war is higher than frozen assets.  A better solution for western credit crisis! 


Stop Regime Change! Stop Killing Civilians! Stop Destroying Nations!.
 
  CNN Video U.S. is 'disgusted' over UN Syria veto

US-EU coalition has become, on one hand a mad dog attacking sovereign nations, on the other hand, a corrupted policeman representing terrorists and violating International Laws.



UN AGGRESSION LEAD BY US-EU COALLITION
The Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi said at the United Nations on 23rd Sept 2009 that UN Security Council is a 'Terror Council' and he called all nations to join to abolish UN . Today Gaddafi's statement is more valid than ever. One must listen (Above) recent speech by UN Ambassador Susan Rice to realize how aggressive and manipulative her voice after succeeding previous resolution to invade nations due to impotency of members of UNSC. She addresses the permanent representatives of UNSC as they were puppets . According to UN Charter every state is treated by every member state with equal rights whether it is big or small. The UN Security Council is totally dominated by US-EU coalition and has become a TERROR COUNCIL  serving only interests of few rich powerful nations. The UN charter gives power to use force against another nation only when all members agree to use such power. UN has acted as a  human slaughter passing resolutions to serve interests of few barbaric member states to show power to small nations. Iraq and Libya were bombarded back to stone stage. Libyan leader Mohammar Gaddafi was arrested as a POW and killed . Were rights of POW protected?Any investigations done? No. The US-EU-coalition bombing brought Libya back to stone age and Libyan financial assets were frozen. Libyan oil and weapon deals are unaccounted after payments. Any recovery/ rebuilding plan?  ( American credit crisis and forces of 'change cannot be reversed' ( 54' Obama Union Speech Jan 2012). US-EU economies are recovering after waves of Arab Democracy faster than ever. The western media too applauded the mass civilian killings done by US-EU and boasted reinstalling "democracy" The coalition forces bombings flat the civilizations around the world (watch Libyan war and operation 'Dawn Odyssey' destroying entire Libyan infra-structure)and same western media conduct so called "investigative journalism" on poor nations are compiled with lies agreed upon  with terrorists and US-EU coalition agents. What we can do about it? Keep at least using veto power to say "NO!" at United Nations Security Council to prevent these mad dogs from killing innocent civilians around the world on the name of democracy!

Muammar Gaddafi Speech To United Nations Sept 23, 2009



The New World Terrorism: Regime Changes
Since the  Al Qaeda terrorist attack on WTC tower on September 11th 2001, the coalition of America and Europe work hand-in-hand on 'war on terror' showing aggression towards rising nations.

IRAQ WAR
The Iraq war was an (illegal) invasion under the false pretext 'Iraq has Nuclear weapons and WMD' to change regime of Iraq using September 11th attacks. The US justified Iraq war was to disarm WMD (weapons of mass destruction) and to remove Sadam's dictatorship who killed Iraqi civilians using chemical weapons.

The 2003 invasion of Iraq (March 19–May 1, 2003), was a operation by a combined force of troops from the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia and Poland invaded Iraq and toppled the regime of Saddam Hussein in 21 days of major combat operations". According to U.S. President George W. Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair, the coalition mission was "to disarm Iraq of weapons of mass destruction, to end Saddam Hussein's support for terrorism, and to free the Iraqi people." According to Blair, the trigger was Iraq's failure to take a "final opportunity" to disarm itself of alleged nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons that U.S. and British officials called an immediate and intolerable threat to world peace. In a January 2003 CBS poll 64% of U.S. nationals had approved of military action against Iraq, however 63% wanted Bush to find a diplomatic solution rather than go to war, and 62% believed the threat of terrorism directed against the U.S. would increase due to war. The invasion of Iraq was strongly opposed by some traditional U.S. allies, including the governments of France, Germany, New Zealand, and Canada. The invasion of Iraq was strongly opposed by some traditional U.S. allies, including the governments of France, Germany, New Zealand, and Canada. According to the French academic Dominique Reynié, between January 3 and April 12, 2003, 36 million people across the globe took part in almost 3,000 protests against the Iraq war. By June 2003 it was reported that the total tally of civilian deaths amounted to 36,533, and the study was only conducted in the non-Kurdish areas of Iraq. According to Lancet survey Iraq war has cost 601,027 violent deaths between March 2003 and June 2006. In 2005, the Central Intelligence Agency released a report saying that no weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq.

After Iraq war was over the US President G.W. Bush admitted that Iraq was not responsible for 9-11 attacks and Iraq did not have WMD. Iraq was bombed back to stone age. The so called 'guardian of democracy and human rights', USA committed  more civilian killings in Iraq than terrorists and had never been questioned by human rights organizations. Those war crimes were deliberate and targeted killings using forbidden weapons. USA claimed the killings were according to Geneva convention. They mastered the art of abusing and killing of civilians according to Geneva convention. The prisoner of war Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden was caught and killed without bringing him to justice.  US Bush administration admitted it had torture houses violating human rights laws.

VIDEO: US President George W Bush Admitting invasion of Iraq had nothing to do with 9-11 terrorist attack  of WTC tower.

 

THE CORRUPTED POLICEMAN

Leaders lead by example. Leaders act as role models. The US-EU coalition who claims they are 'the guardian' of democracy and human rights must lead by example to other nations. While continuing to commit war crimes by US-EU coalition during war on terror ( criticism on pro-democracy and on war on terror) and democratic uprisings they have no moral right to finger point other nations for violating laws. As Sri Lanka Secretary of Defense Mr Gotabaya Rajapaksa points out if US-EU coalition wants to pursue war crime investigations against alleged civilian casualties during last stage of war against LTTE (other than LLRC report ), then they must first hold investigations into US-EU war crimes. The US Foreign policy is to harass rising nations under false pretexts; it happened from Iraq (2003) to Libya (2011).

WHO IS NEXT IN REGIME CHANGE?

Currently showing aggression to Syria (despite people's support to President Asad) and Iran for regime changes. Near future it will spread to Asia.  Invasion of these sovereign nations were done with or without  a resolution passing at United Nations Security Council to serve  their own interests. While neglecting own 'blood baths'  and shooting the messengers who revealed US war crimes they accused other nations (including Sri Lanka) for protecting civilians from terrorists as 'blood baths' through UNITED NATIONS. The unintentional civilian casualties by sovereign nations during protection of own civilians from terrorists were called as grave violation against humanity. Why? To change regimes while neglecting own crimes during invasions (Iraq) and aggressions (Libya).

What is the Role UN, US-EU?

So the role of USA and EU is clear: a CORRUPTED POLICEMAN! Sri Lanka is a victim of corrupted US-EU policeman. Sri Lanka has been pressurized by corrupted US-EU coalition and its corrupted agents of human rights (Amnesty International gets funds from LTTE, AI along with the US-based Human Rights Watch (HRW) and International Crisis Group (ICG) turned down an invitation from the Sri Lanka's Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission (LLRC) to testify). US-EU coalition is lobbied by LTTE terrorists against Sri Lanka Government which defeated LTTE in May 2009. Sri Lanka will be under interrogation of this CORRUPTED POLICEMAN at the UN Human Rights Council’s 19th session begin on February 27 and end on March 23, 2012.

US has already decided to send it's envoys to Sri Lanka   to get first hand information on the matters relevant to proposed resolution against Sri Lanka at 19th session of UNHRC. Ms. Clinton has invited Dr. Peiris to Washington DC "to discuss matters further. President Rajapaksa has asked Dr. Peiris to accept this invitation so he could explain Sri Lanka’s case. Civilian security across the globe, including democracy, human rights and rule of law are in crisis due to hippocratic attitude of the US-EU coalition. Sri Lanka as a small nation has combated terrorism effectively (defeating 30years LTTE terrorism in 3 years) than US-EU coalition as a collection of nations done for 10 years (unaccomplished missions in Iraq, Afghanistan). Yet the coalition shows its usual dictatorship towards Sri Lanka.


Sri Lanka was Accused for 'Blood Bath' for Fighting Terrorism in 2009


Arab wave of democracy in 2011
The democratic wave of uprising sponsored by US and EU is to safeguard Israel in partnership. Israel has been a partner in progress for USA and EU and so will be the Tamil Diaspora to act against Sri Lanka. "The current developments in the Arab world, should be a wake-up call for policy makers and opinion leaders in the West. What is happening in Tunisia, Egypt and other Arab countries puts democracy support back on the foreign policy agenda. Stability is not served by supporting regimes that oppress their people. Peace and prosperity can only be achieved through well-functioning democratic states." Until Syria uprisings of democracy have been successful but it is unlikely to reach Syria "for one thing, Syria doesn't depend on billions of dollars in U.S. aid in the way that Egypt and Jordan do. The Assad regime, which has been a pariah country for years because of its support for various of the region's militant groups, gets only sanctions from the U.S. government, and comparatively little international aid besides. Its currency isn't traded on international markets. Its banking system is pretty closed. And its stock market is miniscule. Syria's central bank has been stocking up hard currency for years for just such occasions, and Damascus doesn't have the vast slums teeming with African-levels of poverty that Cairo has. That means that unlike Egypt — which, out of deference to the domestic sensitivities of its U.S. patron, chose to do its dirty work against democracy protestors in Tahrir Square with plain-clothed thugs rather than use an army funded by American taxpayers — Syria has shown precious little concern for world opinion in meting out domestic repression. Being on the wrong side of the Bush Administration's "democracy agenda" also helped the Syrian regime. While many Syrians resent the blatantly rigging of their country's elections, stability-Syrian style was preferred by many to the chaotic democracy created next door by the U.S. invasion of Iraq... Syria also has a few strategic cards — notably its support for Palestinian militants Hamas and Lebanese militants Hizballah — to play when necessary to divert attention from domestic discontent...( read more )"
ROAD MAP TO MIDDLE EAST PEACE
This video embedded below details Israel's critical security need for defensible borders to prevent threats to its existence.