Sunday, July 1, 2012

UNIVERSAL DECLARATION ON DEMOCRACY






UNIVERSAL DECLARATION ON DEMOCRACY
Declaration adopted without a vote* by the Inter-Parliamentary Council at its 161st session
(Cairo, 16 September 1997)

The Inter-Parliamentary Council,
Reaffirming the Inter-Parliamentary Union's commitment to peace and development and convinced that the strengthening of the democratisation process and representative institutions will greatly contribute to attaining this goal,
Reaffirming also the calling and commitment of the Inter-Parliamentary Union to promoting democracy and the establishment of pluralistic systems of representative government in the world, and wishing to strengthen its sustained and multiform action in this field,
Recalling that each State has the sovereign right, freely to choose and develop, in accordance with the will of its people, its own political, social, economic and cultural systems without interference by other States in strict conformity with the United Nations Charter,
Recalling also the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted on 10 December 1948, as well as the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights adopted on 16 December 1966, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination adopted on 21 December 1965 and the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women adopted on 18 December 1979,
Recalling further the Declaration on Criteria for Free and Fair Elections which it adopted in March 1994 and in which it confirmed that in any State the authority of the government can derive only from the will of the people as expressed in genuine, free and fair elections,
Referring to the Agenda for Democratisation presented on 20 December 1996 by the UN Secretary-General to the 51st session of the United Nations General Assembly,
Adopts the following Universal Declaration on Democracy and urges Governments and Parliaments throughout the world to be guided by its content:

FIRST PART - THE PRINCIPLES OF DEMOCRACY
1. Democracy is a universally recognised ideal as well as a goal, which is based on common values shared by peoples throughout the world community irrespective of cultural, political, social and economic differences. It is thus a basic right of citizenship to be exercised under conditions of freedom, equality, transparency and responsibility, with due respect for the plurality of views, and in the interest of the polity.
2. Democracy is both an ideal to be pursued and a mode of government to be applied according to modalities which reflect the diversity of experiences and cultural particularities without derogating from internationally recognised principles, norms and standards. It is thus a constantly perfected and always perfectible state or condition whose progress will depend upon a variety of political, social, economic, and cultural factors.
3. As an ideal, democracy aims essentially to preserve and promote the dignity and fundamental rights of the individual, to achieve social justice, foster the economic and social development of the community, strengthen the cohesion of society and enhance national tranquillity, as well as to create a climate that is favourable for international peace. As a form of government, democracy is the best way of achieving these objectives; it is also the only political system that has the capacity for self-correction.
4. The achievement of democracy presupposes a genuine partnership between men and women in the conduct of the affairs of society in which they work in equality and complementarity, drawing mutual enrichment from their differences.
5. A state of democracy ensures that the processes by which power is acceded to, wielded and alternates allow for free political competition and are the product of open, free and non-discriminatory participation by the people, exercised in accordance with the rule of law, in both letter and spirit.
6. Democracy is inseparable from the rights set forth in the international instruments recalled in the preamble. These rights must therefore be applied effectively and their proper exercise must be matched with individual and collective responsibilities.
7. Democracy is founded on the primacy of the law and the exercise of human rights. In a democratic State, no one is above the law and all are equal before the law.
8. Peace and economic, social and cultural development are both conditions for and fruits of democracy. There is thus interdependence between peace, development, respect for and observance of the rule of law and human rights.

SECOND PART - THE ELEMENTS AND EXERCISE OF DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENT
9. Democracy is based on the existence of well-structured and well-functioning institutions, as well as on a body of standards and rules and on the will of society as a whole, fully conversant with its rights and responsibilities.
10. It is for democratic institutions to mediate tensions and maintain equilibrium between the competing claims of diversity and uniformity, individuality and collectivity, in order to enhance social cohesion and solidarity.
11. Democracy is founded on the right of everyone to take part in the management of public affairs; it therefore requires the existence of representative institutions at all levels and, in particular, a Parliament in which all components of society are represented and which has the requisite powers and means to express the will of the people by legislating and overseeing government action.
12. The key element in the exercise of democracy is the holding of free and fair elections at regular intervals enabling the people's will to be expressed. These elections must be held on the basis of universal, equal and secret suffrage so that all voters can choose their representatives in conditions of equality, openness and transparency that stimulate political competition. To that end, civil and political rights are essential, and more particularly among them, the rights to vote and to be elected, the rights to freedom of expression and assembly, access to information and the right to organise political parties and carry out political activities. Party organisation, activities, finances, funding and ethics must be properly regulated in an impartial manner in order to ensure the integrity of the democratic processes.
13. It is an essential function of the State to ensure the enjoyment of civil, cultural, economic, political and social rights to its citizens. Democracy thus goes hand in hand with an effective, honest and transparent government, freely chosen and accountable for its management of public affairs.
14. Public accountability, which is essential to democracy, applies to all those who hold public authority, whether elected or non-elected, and to all bodies of public authority without exception. Accountability entails a public right of access to information about the activities of government, the right to petition government and to seek redress through impartial administrative and judicial mechanisms.
15. Public life as a whole must be stamped by a sense of ethics and by transparency, and appropriate norms and procedures must be established to uphold them.
16. Individual participation in democratic processes and public life at all levels must be regulated fairly and impartially and must avoid any discrimination, as well as the risk of intimidation by State and non-State actors.
17. Judicial institutions and independent, impartial and effective oversight mechanisms are the guarantors for the rule of law on which democracy is founded. In order for these institutions and mechanisms fully to ensure respect for the rules, improve the fairness of the processes and redress injustices, there must be access by all to administrative and judicial remedies on the basis of equality as well as respect for administrative and judicial decisions both by the organs of the State and representatives of public authority and by each member of society.
18. While the existence of an active civil society is an essential element of democracy, the capacity and willingness of individuals to participate in democratic processes and make governance choices cannot be taken for granted. It is therefore necessary to develop conditions conducive to the genuine exercise of participatory rights, while also eliminating obstacles that prevent, hinder or inhibit this exercise. It is therefore indispensable to ensure the permanent enhancement of, inter alia, equality, transparency and education and to remove obstacles such as ignorance, intolerance, apathy, the lack of genuine choices and alternatives and the absence of measures designed to redress imbalances or discrimination of a social, cultural, religious and racial nature, or for reasons of gender.
19. A sustained state of democracy thus requires a democratic climate and culture constantly nurtured and reinforced by education and other vehicles of culture and information. Hence, a democratic society must be committed to education in the broadest sense of the term, and more particularly civic education and the shaping of a responsible citizenry.
20. Democratic processes are fostered by a favourable economic environment; therefore, in its overall effort for development, society must be committed to satisfying the basic economic needs of the most disadvantaged, thus ensuring their full integration in the democratic process.
21. The state of democracy presupposes freedom of opinion and expression; this right implies freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.
22. The institutions and processes of democracy must accommodate the participation of all people in homogeneous as well as heterogeneous societies in order to safeguard diversity, pluralism and the right to be different in a climate of tolerance.
23. Democratic institutions and processes must also foster decentralised local and regional government and administration, which is a right and a necessity, and which makes it possible to broaden the base of public participation.

THIRD PART - THE INTERNATIONAL DIMENSION OF DEMOCRACY
24. Democracy must also be recognised as an international principle, applicable to international organisations and to States in their international relations. The principle of international democracy does not only mean equal or fair representation of States; it also extends to the economic rights and duties of States.
25. The principles of democracy must be applied to the international management of issues of global interest and the common heritage of humankind, in particular the human environment.
26. To preserve international democracy, States must ensure that their conduct conforms to international law, refrain from the use or threat of force and from any conduct that endangers or violates the sovereignty and political or territorial integrity of other States, and take steps to resolve their differences by peaceful means.
27. A democracy should support democratic principles in international relations. In that respect, democracies must refrain from undemocratic conduct, express solidarity with democratic governments and non-State actors like non-governmental organisations which work for democracy and human rights, and extend solidarity to those who are victims of human rights violations at the hands of undemocratic régimes. In order to strengthen international criminal justice, democracies must reject impunity for international crimes and serious violations of fundamental human rights and support the establishment of a permanent international criminal court.

U.S wants an action plan

July 1, 2012 The United States says the government has to have an action plan that deals with reconciliation issues.
During a live video online chat with journalists from around the world including Sri Lanka, U.S. Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights and Labor Michael Posner said that as far as the U.S is concerned there is a big unfinished agenda in Sri Lanka.
“We are going to continue to raise those issues with the government,” Posner said in response to a question raised by a Sri Lankan journalist.
The online discussion was mainly focused on the U.S State Department’s annual global human rights report released recently.
Posner recalled the discussions he and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton had with External Affairs Minister G.L Peiris in Washington recently.
He said that a range of issues were discussed including issues which continue to be of concern and the U.S government will continue to push on those issues.
“We are happy that there is a Lessons Learned and Reconciliation Commission but the government has to have an action plan that deals with reconciliation issues, deals with the issues of discrimination still going on in the north and a range of other things to incorporate the Tamil population into the life blood of Sri Lanka,” he said.
He also said that the U.S has not singled out Sri Lanka and that U.S will apply the same standard under the universal declaration to Sri Lanka as is applied with other countries.
Posner meanwhile rejected the characterization that the US has become an arbitrator to human rights around the world.
Asked if the human rights report can be used as a tool to take action against Sri Lanka or any other country, Posner said that the purpose of the report is to give the US a baseline of information on what’s going on in every country in the world.
“Every country is evaluated by the same set of standards or criteria. It gives us a basis for making policy but it’s not a policy making document.  It’s a tool for diplomats on how to deal with a country,” he said.

Movement for a just and righteous society in Sri Lanka

Original post: Ven. Sobitha — a Buddhist puts his finger on Lanka’s ‘civilisational crisis’

11-2Most Venerable Maduluwave Sobitha Thera has set up an organization called “Peoples’ movement towards a just and righteous society” to ‘bring democracy back to Sri Lanka.’ Ven. Sobitha Thera says that in order to sustain democracy in the country it is essential that a peoples’ movement, geared towards the creation of a just and righteous society, is brought to power.

In an interview with LAKBIMAnEWS, the thera said: “If a country is governed according to democratic norms and principles then such governance should be evident to everyone.”

Excerpts of the interview:
But it is not so anymore. The first is the independence of the judiciary. It is now clear to the country that there is no more independence within the judiciary. It has become way too politicized. The public is aware how some people withdraw court cases they have filed at the eleventh hour, just when a case is about to be called. In fact cases are withdrawn by the Attorney General (AG). In some instances, when an appeal is lost, such cases are withdrawn. So where is the democracy in such a situation, you tell me? Everyone in this country has to abide by the law. There has to be a mechanism whereby the independence of the judiciary is protected at all times. Some of the Supreme Court judges, once they retire are showered with top posts along with excellent perks. They know that when they retire they are going to be well looked after. Such expectations and hopes should not be given to SC judges. They should lead quiet lives once they retire.

Police force politicized
Secondly, the police force has to be entrusted with the task of maintaining law and order devoid of political influence.

Today the police force has become politicized so much so that there is no independence for the police force in the country to carry out their job.

The best example is the underworld leader, Julampitiye Amare, who despite over 100 warrants against him, could not be apprehended by the police. He moved openly while brandishing firearms. Under whose authority did he do this, or how could he do this?

It is clear to the public as to who is shielding whom. The police later said that Amare had only five warrants. In that case, wasn’t that number of warrants sufficient to arrest him? The unfortunate incident at Katuwana occurred due to Amare being allowed by the government and the police to roam freely. There are scores of other instances that could be cited to justify claims that  the Police Department has become politicized, from the very top to the lowest ranks.

Using clout to flout rules
Third, there is no use in conducting elections under the present system of elections. Conducting polls sans an independent election commission leads to blatant violations of all election rules when polls are conducted. No election rules can be enforced without the establishment of an independent election commission.

It is the incumbent government that is using its clout to flout all such rules. This has been true in the past, it is true at present and it will be the case in the future as well unless the situation is transformed,” said Sobitha Thera.

Independent commissions

The thera (see main story) also said that even the LLRC recommendations have highlighted the setting up of independent judicial, police, election and state service commissions, and bemoaned the fact that the government has done nothing proactive to address these issues.

He maintained that if independent commissions are set up they will also go a long way towards establishing democracy in the country and will pave the way for a lasting solution to the national issue as well.

11-3“The Executive President could overrule any laws or acts adopted by parliament. Such is the authority and power vested in him. Even in the Mahinda Chinthana it has been clearly stated that the Executive Presidency will be abolished. This was even stated by former President Chandrika Kumaratunga,” Sobitha Thera observed.

The Chief Incumbent of the Kotte Sri Naga Vihara said that the onus is on the government to set up and activate the independent commissions if they are sincere or genuine in their efforts to establish democratic norms and principles in the country.
He also emphasized that the government had invited the wrath of the international lobby vis-a-vis the Geneva resolution that was passed early this year due to it not being sincere in its efforts to traverse the path of democracy.

“Clearly the government has failed in allowing the people to live in peace and sans any fear. There were scores of incidents that took place in the past where people were allegedly abducted by white vans, etc. Now this too is a form of terrorism that is being unleashed in the country and the government is not determined to eradicate it though they wiped out Prabakaran’s terrorism. What we are requesting from the government is to look into these issues seriously. This was the same message given to the government by both the UNHRC in Geneva and the LLRC report, (LLRC is Lessons Learned Reconciliation Commission)” the thera averred.

Ven. Sobitha Thera said that it is time for all Sri Lankans to put aside their differences, whatever they may be and force the government of the day to adhere to democratic principles and maintain democracy in governance.

He also urged ministers and MPs to raise a voice from within the government circles towards this end.
“This request carries no party, race, caste, creed or affiliation. It is the crying need of the hour of all Sri Lankans. Justice is our religion. Equality is our religion. Independence is our religion and freedom is our religion. It is about time that the people take to the streets to achieve all of these,” he affirmed.

Maduluwave Sobitha Thera insisted that he is not interested in setting up a joint opposition.
“This should not be construed as the setting up of a joint opposition. That is entirely different from what we are planning right now. We do not have political undertones or connections. We encompass all citizens in this country without discriminating anyone under any circumstance. All are welcome - irrespective of who they are,” he asserted.

Related Posts:
  1.  UNIVERSAL DECLARATION ON DEMOCRACY
  2. LLRC-REPORT (pdf file 407 pages)
  3. Darusman Report (UN Panel of Experts on Sri Lanka War Accountability) pdf 243 pages, 31 March 2011
  4. What is UN panel of Experts on Accountability in Sri Lanka 
  5. Critic on LLRC: Statement on the Report of Sri Lanka's Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation Commission
  6. Recommendations of LLRC report implemented - Dr. Kohona
  7.  TNA rejects LLRC report as failing to meet international standards of accountability and right of victims to truth, justice and reparations
  8. Democracy and Human Rights: UN
  9. Human Rights

උපාලි විජේවර්ධන ජීවතුන් අතර. වසර 27ක් මෙක්සිකෝ සිරගෙදර

උපාලි විජේවර්ධන
Sri Lankan millionaire Upali Wijewardene who died in Jet Crash on 13 Feb 1983 is alive in Mexico, 27 yrs in prison cell. (උපුටා ගැනීම  lankaleaks ) "උපාලි විජේවර්දන 1983/පෙබරවාරි 13 වනදා ගුවන් අනතුරකින්  මිය ගියා යැයී විශ්වාස කල උපාලි මහතා වසර 26  ක්ම මෙක්ෂීකොවේ ඉස්ලස් මරියස්  නම් සිරගෙදර මත්ද්‍රවය ප්‍රවාහන මොලකරු චෝදනාවකට සිර දඩුවම් විදිමින් සිට ඇත. 1980 දශකයේ ලංකාවේ නමගිය මිලියන හිමියකු වූ උපාලි විජේවර්දන තමන්ගේ ව්‍යාපාරය කුඩු ව්‍යාපාරයෙන් දියුණු කරගත් බව තතු දත්තෝ දනිති. මැලේසියාවේ කොකෝවා වතු මිලදී ගෙන තිබු මොහු චොක්ලට් සමාගම් ව්‍යාපාරිකයෙකු ලෙස ප්‍රසිද්දිය දිනා සිටි නමුදු ජාත්‍යන්තරව එවකට මොහු මත්ද්‍රව්‍ය ජාවාරම්කරුවකු ලෙස ඇමරිකාවට අවශ්‍යව සිටි අයෙකි. ලංකාවට වඩා මෙක්සිකොවේ තම මුදල් තැන්පත් කර තිබු මොහු 1983 පෙබරවාරි 13 වන අගහරුවාදා තමන්ගේ ජෙට් යානය කඩාවැටීමෙන් දිවිගලවාගෙන ඇත්තේ ජාත්‍යන්තර මුහුදු මාර්ගයේ ගමන් කරමින් තිබු නැවකට පින්සිදු වන්නටයී. පසුව ලංකාවේ සුළු ව්‍යාපාරත් බිරිදත් අතහැර මැලේසියානු බිරිද සමග රහස් ජීවිතයක් ආරම්බ කොට ඇති මොහු සැගවුණු ජීවිතය තුල ලෝකයේ අංක එකේ මත්ද්‍රවය වෙළෙන්දෙක් වී ඇත්තේ රාෆායල් කරෝ යන නමිනි. මොහුගේ තිබු සමේ පැහැය නිසා මොහු මෙක්ෂිකො පෙනුමක් ගෙන ඇත. මොහුගේ ගුවන් අනතුරින් පසුව ඉන්දුනීසියා සහ මලයාසියා නාවික හමුදා ඒකාබද්දව මලක්කා සමුද්‍රයේ පරීක්ෂණ පැවැත්වුවද මොහු සමග ගමන් ගත් අනෙක් පස්දෙනාගේ තොරතුරක් වත් සොයාගැනීමට නොහැකි වී ඇත. මොහුගේ ජෙට් යානය ක්වාලා සෙලෙන්ගර් ප්‍රදේශයෙදී  ගුවන් ගත වී විනාඩි 20 කින් පසුව තොරතුරක් නැති වී ඇත. අතුරුදහන් වන විට උපාලි විජේවර්දනගේ වයස අවුරුදු 44 කි ජෙට් යානය පිටත් වුයේ සුබැන්ග් ගුවන් තොටුපොලෙනි.

සත්‍ය තොරතුරු අනුව ගුවන් යානයේ බෝම්බයක් සවිකොට ඇතිබව ජෙට් යානයට දැනගැනීමට ලැබුණු මොහොතේම සියලුදෙනාට පෙර උපාලි මහතාව ජීවිතාරක්ෂක කබා සමග බිමට හෙළා අනෙක් පිරිස සුදානම් වනවාත් සමග යානය පුපුරා ගොස් ඇත. මෙහිදී විසිවුණු කැබැල්ලකින් එම මහතාට දරුණු තුවාල සිදුවී ඇත. මුහුදේ පාවෙමින් සිටියදී නැවක් විසින් වාසනාවකට බේරා ගැනීම ගැන ඒ මහතා අප සමග කියා සිටියේ. “මම නැතිවුණා කියලා අනිවාර්යෙන්ම කැළණි හාමුදුරුවෝ මට සෙත් පතන්න ඇති එකයී මට ජීවත් වෙන වාසනාව උදා වුනේ. කැලණි පන්සලේ හාමුදුරුවන් සහ පොඩි හාමුදුරුවන් ආදරෙන් මතක් කරන උපාලි මහතා” මම 1983 සැප්තැම්බරේ නැවත මලයාසියාවට ගියා වෙන නමකින් යනකොට බිරිදට දරුවා ලැබිලා. එත් එක්කම මම එයා එක්ක වෙනම ජිවිතයක් පටන් ගන්න නැවෙන් මෙක්සිකොවට ගියා. මම එහෙ මගේ සල්ලි වලින් අලුත් ජීවිතයක් පටන් ගත්තා. නමුත් මගේ මිතුරන් මාව පාවලා දුන් නිසා මම පොලිසියට හසු වුණා ඔවුනට අවශ්‍ය වුනේ මගේ සල්ලි විතරයී. මට සල්ලි නිසා මගේ බිරින්දැවරු දෙදෙනාම නැතිවුණා දරුවත් නැතිවුණා මම වසර 45 කට හිරේ ගියේ. නමුත් මම හිරේදී හොදින් හිටියා සෙන් බුද්ධාගමේ පොත් හැකි තරම් කියෙව්වා මුලදී මට ගහල හිරේදීම මරන්න හැදුවා නමුත් මම බේරුනා. පසුව මට අන්තර්ජාලයෙන් දැන ගන්න ලැබුණා මම වෙනුවෙන් නිතර කැලණියේ පුද පූජා කල බව ඒ නිසා වෙන්න ඇති.”

තම චිත්‍රපටයක් වැනි අතීතය සිහිකරමින් අප සමග පැවසු මොහුට අද අවසානයේ ඉතිරව ඇත්තේ එදා සොච්චම් ව්‍යාපාරයක් වූ උපාලි ව්‍යාපාරය පමණය නමුත් මොහු ලංකාවට දුරකතනයෙන් ඇමතුවද ලැබී ඇත්තේ පිළිගැනීම් නොව මරණ තර්ජනයී. වෙල්ගම සහෝදරයින් දැන් ඇදුම් ගැලවීමට කාලයයි අපට හමුවූ උපාලි මහතා පැවසු එක දෙයක් සදහන් කිරීමට කැමති “මට නිමල් වෙල්ගම කිව්වා” උපාලි උබ දැන් මැරිලා  ඉවරයී උබට ඕනෑතරම් කොම්පැනියේ සල්ලිවලින් පින් දුන්නා උබව ආපහු මැරුවට කාටවත් නඩු නැහැ ඒ නිසා මෙහෙ එන්න එපා” නමුත් ජීවිතයේ  අනෙක කම්කටලු අත්දැකීම් විද ඇති උපාලි මහතා මෙම දිනවල තමන්ගේ මහලු වයසේදී එකම පුතාව සහ මැලේසියානු බිරිදව සොයමින් සිටි. මුදල් වවලට වඩා වටිනා දේවල් මට තියෙනවා ඒවත් නැති වුණා දාට මම ලංකාවට එනවා ගුවන් තොටුපොළට එන්න පෙරම මාධ්‍ය කරුවන් කැදවලා ඊට පස්සේ බලමු මාව මරණ හැටි අපේ පරපුරේ පණ හයියයී” විජේවර්දනලා, ජයවර්දනලා අකාලේ මරුනේ නැහැ.

LANKALEAKS විශේෂ වාර්තා කරු විදුර සමරසිංහ මහතා මෙක්සිකොවේ සිට වාර්තා කරයී. උපාලි මහතගේ තොරතුරු දැනගැනීමට කැමැත්තක් දක්වන යමෙක් ඇත්නම් lankalekas  skype  මගින් අපගෙන් යුරෝපයේ දහවල් වෙලාවලදී  විමසිය හැක. නැතහොත් vidurasamara _65@gmail.com වෙත දැන්විමෙන්ද පුළුවන..."